Categories
Letters

Letter from Ellee to Reida

Loading

Dear Reida,
I have thought and prayed long and hard over every word in this letter and
have read and reread it before sending it to you. I love my Stewart family and it breaks my heart to see what is continuing to happen within it. Because I know directly from James, Frankie and you the things that were said and done over the course of the three years leading up to Frankie’s death and now, even after his death, are continuing against him and his family, I cannot stand by and not try to reach out to you before it’s too late.

My hope and prayer is that it will remind you of all the things that Frankie did for you and his dad and James over the course of his remarkable life and make you think about the consequences to you and your legacy within the Stewart family if you continue with this lawsuit against Frankie’s estate. I fear that you will irreparably split members of the family off from you and that the memories of you that will be passed to the generations that are now and are yet to be born will not be those of a kind and loving matriarch but rather of one whose last years were spent inflicting pain and hurt on so many members of her family. Though I know that this is not your lawsuit as much as it is James none the less it bears your name.


In 2016 when James contacted me, I was thrilled to reconnect with the two
of you. I was always closest to Bro Frank’s generation, especially Auntie, Uncle, Jack and Gilvie and after their deaths i lost contact with everyone but Frankie. From our first meeting at Auntie’s we had an inexplicable connection that over the years turned into a deep bond of love and respect as we became each other’s confidant. No matter the time that passed between calls nor how brief they might be, we always knew we were only a phone call away if needed.


When James first began talking to me about his belief that he had been
cheated out of his rightful inheritance from Bro Frank and that it was
somehow all Frankie’s fault, (tried to listen and be sympathetic to him, even though I knew none of it was true because I remembered the events
contained in this letter in real time. It soon became clear that he not only
believed what he was saying but that he was actively planning by any means
possible to get back what he thought he was owed. It also became clear to
me that he began planting seeds of doubt about Frankie in you, Reida.


I listened to you struggle as more pressure was applied to you by James.
And, ( listened to Frankie as he grew more bewildered and then hurt that you would actually believe him capable of some of the things you were now questioning him about.


I listened to James as his anger and malice toward Frankie grew and as his
frustration with you grew because you did not want to hurt Frankie or take
legal action against him. I began keeping notes afraid of where all of this was going.


On Aug 16, 2020, what I believe to be James’s desperation, boiled over and
that was the day he told me that he had issued you the ultimatum that you
had to choose between him and Frankie and that whichever one you chose
you could have no more contact with the other. I pleaded with James not to do that to you because I couldn’t imagine anything worse for a mother than to have to choose between her children, especially at your advanced age. But his greed, and I came to believe, his hatred and jealousy of Frankie were so great, he forced you to make a choice and even wrote down for you the words you said to Frankie that Monday morning, August 17, 2020, that would sever your relationship with him. I know that because James called me afterwards gloating that you had done it. I knew from the time James issued the ultimatum that you really did not have a choice. Though Frankie provided for all your needs financially, as well as being the one you always called when you needed things done, it was James and Ann that provided the hands on caregiving, i.e., going with you to doctor’s appointments, having you over for dinner on a weekly basis, taking you to Ruidoso with them almost every weekend, etc. James made it clear it was them that stood between you and going to a facility to live. I knew from you how much you feared that happening.


I knew that it was James who was behind all of it, manipulating and
frightening you into doing and saying the things you did and I told Frankie
what I knew to try to ease his heartache as well as bewilderment that you
would actually tell him not to come back to your house or even call you. But that didn’t take away the hurt and ache in his heart which he carried with him to his grave 3 months later.


Frankie and I spoke every day for several weeks after that as he was
grappling with your words and actions. We spoke on the Monday before he
was hospitalized after he had received a text from James which read, “See
YOU in court”. Those turned out to be the last words Frankie would hear from the brother whom he had stood beside and supported through his nervous breakdown following Daniel’s death. Despite what you both said to him and about him, you know that it was Frankie who shouldered the burdens and needs of the whole family after Daniel died. He was a devoted son and brother who willing took on added responsibility. He remained a devoted son to Bro. Frank until he died and to you until you turned him away.

It was Frankie who gave James a job at Sonitrol and a credit card through Sonitrol when James couldn’t get one on his own. And it was James who ran that credit card up so high that Frankie had to pay it down so all the other Sonitrol cards wouldn’t stay frozen because of James. It was Frankie who “invested” and lost money when James came asking for help to start up two ultimately failed business schemes.


It was Frankie who took care of the outstanding debts that James created in Bro Frank’s company so his dad did not have to go through the humiliation of filing bankruptcy. It was Frankie who made a position and office available at Sonitrol for his Dad so he could still feel useful. It was Frankie who devotedly cared for his Dad until his death and it was to Frankie that Bro Frank entrusted your care for the rest of your life, as he made clear in HIS will. And, for the last 20 years, it was Frankie who took care of the vast majority, if not all of your financial needs, including the care and maintenance of you, your house, yard and vehicle.


Because having money in your own name was so important to you, it was
Frankie who oversaw your Raymond James account as well as your checking account, and by so doing there was over $300,000 in those combined accounts at the time you took them away from him and gave them to James to manage.


I know that when the Mexican bank failed and he was struggling to stay
afloat financially until he was able to make the deal with Ga-Pacific, it was to Bro Frank he turned. I find it interesting in the lawsuit that the claim is
Frankie borrowed the funds from you, because I know that the Stewart
brothers had a hard and fast rule that wives did not participate in business
and financial matters. For tax or estate planning purposes they might put
assets in their wives name, but the men were still in control of the assets.
understand that you are saying there is no formal record of his paying the
monies back but you and I both know he more than paid it all back before Bro Frank died. And, if you tally up all the money he spent from his personal funds to maintain your lifestyle as well as maintain your house and grounds, furnish you with a maid, gardener and driver when you no longer could drive, I think you would find he more than paid you back.

Frank, Sr knew all the money Frankie had given back to him after the fiasco with James and taking care of him for the rest of his life. He and Frankie were squared away at the end of his life, which is why Bro Frank made it clear in HIS will that the only thing James was to inherit was a 1991Jeep Cherokee and that the house as well as everything else would eventually go to Frankie at your death. For that reason it never occurred to Frankie that he needed to keep records of when and how any debt was repaid and apparently Bro Frank didn’t feel it was necessary either. Neither of them could ever have imagined that the day would come when you would disregard Bro. Frank’s wishes and betray Frankie to make sure you could leave even more money than the $300,000 to poor little James at your death. It was never really about the possibility of not having money to take care of your needs for the rest of your life, because Frankie had made it clear to you that he would make sure you were cared for the rest of your life, just as he had faithfully provided for you the past 20 years. it was all about a money grab for James.


Frankie asked me at some point after things got so unpleasant between you, if I remembered how growing up it had always been you and the two younger boys vs him and I did and I do. He said “I guess I should not be surprised that it is now Mother and James against me.”


Reida, I feel sure you remember the vast difference in the way Frankie was
raised as compared to the two younger boys. Bro Frank had Frankie working all the time when he wasn’t in school almost from the time he could walk and when he graduated from high school he was put out on his own to make his way in the world with no help from either of you. In fact you moved with the younger ones to Canada leaving Frankie alone (Auntie called it abandoned) in El Paso. It was Auntie and Jo Ruth who kept him fed and it was Auntie and Uncle who slipped him money to help him survive as he picked up all the work he could find while paying for his college education. You have no idea the struggle and hardship he went through during those years and how determined he was that he would prove to you and Bro Frank that he would make something worthwhile of his life even without any assistance from you. He told me when he was just 21 that he would be a millionaire by the time he was 45 no matter how many hours he had to work to achieve it.


By contrast, while Frankie was struggling going to college and working such long grueling hours, we watched as Daniel and James were pampered by you and Bro Frank and were given a free ride for their every need, including their education. I never heard Frankie say nor did he ever write me one angry word about you and his Dad, but I can tell you Auntie and I had plenty of anger and resentment for the way Frankie was treated.

Frankie was such a wonderful man who lived his whole life with honor and
integrity. He was loved and admired by so many, many people. He was kind, thoughtful, compassionate, generous and was the most optimistic person I have ever known. Always he was an encourager and the first to reach out to someone in need. He asked me once if I had to describe him in one word what would it be and without having to think I said Servant. He faithfully served his Lord, his family, his church, his community and his fellow man his whole life.


I am also aware that he was not perfect. He had his flaws as we all do. As
much as we loved and respected each other, we certainly had our differences from time to time and the biggest difference we ever had was
about the cavalier way he treated the Covid virus. As a nurse I was seeing
and hearing what it was aoing to people in real time but I could not get
through to him. In the end, his stubbornness, pride and maybe his cowboy
mindset that he could “handle that little virus” cost him his life, even though I told him one of the worst thing about Covid was not being able to predict how each person would respond.


Over the years he had always called me for health related questions about
himself, his employees or friends. When I would suggest he needed a
physician to answer certain things, he would always come back with, “but
YOU are the one I trust the most”. So, I was not surprised when he was
hospitalized with Covid, he told his doctors that they were to talk with me
about managing his care. I followed the instructions he gave me, Reida, that was to give you and James no information about his condition. I had the great honor and privilege of walking with him through those last days of his life, though it was also the most excruciatingly painful thing I have ever done in my 40+ years as a nurse. I have missed and mourned him every day since he went Home.


If you continue this vendetta against Frankie for James benefit, perhaps both of you would do well to remember the words found in Proverbs 1:19
“Such are the paths of all who go after ill gotten gains; it takes away the life
Of those who get it” NIV
Sincerely,
Eliee
January 19, 2022

Categories
Letters

Letter from Chris to Reida

Loading

January 13th, 2022

Dear Grandmother,

I hope this letter finds you of sound mind and in the loving embrace of our Lord, Jesus Christ. I want you to know that I did not write this letter with any malice or ill-will, I write it only to make sure you clearly understand what the attached Claim is. It’s a stick of dynamite. If you pursue it, it won’t only destroy your family, but it will forever damage all future generations. That is why I have sent a copy of this letter to everyone, so that the truth can be known by all after the fallout. I can’t imagine this has to do with money, because I’ve never known you to be the type of person who would be so consumed by greed that they would wish to take millions of dollars from anyone, especially your sons widow. I’ve never known you to hold a debt over anyone, because in your life long study of Jesus’ teachings you would know that we’re called to forgive our debtors, just as our debts have been forgiven. You would also know that anyone who desires to have $4 million would not be trusting in God, but seeking their own fortified city. You would know that a heart that desires great riches, especially at the expense of someone else, would never be able to inherit the Kingdom of God. You need to understand that if you pursue this, your entire legacy will be lost. This will be the only act out of the long and bountifully fruitful life that you will be remembered for. There are a series of questions that I think you should ask yourself before you proceed. If Grandad was still alive right now, would he have signed those papers with you? If your beloved son Frank was still alive right now, would you sue him for $4 million? That’s essentially what you’re doing. Lastly, would Jesus do this? This treachery will far outlive you, causing a permanent rift filled with hate and derision between all who are involved. I can say this with confidence as an outsider who is not involved and who you have always trusted. I have nothing to gain or to lose in writing this letter except to try to keep in tact the character and honor of a woman who I have always loved and who has been a faithful disciple of Jesus Christ all of my life. Remember, the minute you put a price on your character, it’s worth nothing and ill gotten gains will never be anything but poison to all who indulge in them. I will always love you and my house will always be open to you.

With Love, your Grandson,

Categories
Lawsuit

The Lawsuit

Loading

(Significant parts are highlighted below)

No. 2020-CPR01624
IN THE ESTATE OF FRANK STEWART II,
DECEASED
IN THE PROBATE COURT NO. 2
EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS
PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
REIDA STEWART, hereinafter known as “Plaintiff’, complains of THE ESTATE OF FRANK STEWART II and CAROLYN STEWART, Independent Executor of the Estate of Frank Stewart II, hereinafter known as “Defendant”, and for cause of action shows:
I.

Selection of Discovery Level and Statement of Relief Sought

The Plaintiff affirmatively pleads that Plaintiff seeks monetary relief over $1,000,000.00, nonmonetary relief and damages of any kind, penalties, costs, expenses, prejudgment interest, and attorney’s fees and discovery must therefore be conducted under Civil Procedure Rule 190.3. The damages sought are within the jurisdictional limits of the court.

II.

Parties and Service of Citation

The Plaintiff is an individual residing in El Paso County, Texas. The Defendant is an individual and is the Independent Executor of the Estate of FRANK STEWART II, deceased, which is being administered in El Paso County, Texas. The Defendant is a resident of El Paso County, Texas, and may be served with process by serving her at 6700 Gato Road, El Paso County, Texas79932.


III.
Factual Basis for the Petition

Plaintiff, REIDA R. STEWART and her husband, FRANK D. STEWART SR. were married in 1942 and had three children, Frank D. Stewart II, Daniel R. Stewart and James G. Stewart.

Prior to 1940, before his marriage to Reida, Frank Sr. purchased property located at 301 Frontera Road, El Paso County, Texas.

Prior to 1983 Reida Stewart (hereinafter “Reida”) and Frank a Stewart (hereinafter “Frank Sr.”) owned property in Canada that they called “Nigel Place.” On or about 1983. Reida and Frank Sr. collectively sold Nigel Place for $860,220 US dollars. Frank Sr. invested $301,353 of the Nigel sales proceeds in the Williams/Cornudas Ranch in Hudspeth County, Texas and Reida invested $239,302 of the Nigel sales proceeds in the Gillum Ranch and $140,000 in the Hudson Ranch (both in Otero County NM).

In 1983, Reida loaned Frank II $30,000.00 to purchase a truck and in 1985 Reida loaned Frank II $10,000.00 to purchase cattle.

In 1985, Frank Sr. and Reida sold their farm located in Dona Ana County, New Mexico and realized net proceeds of $595,033.47.

In 1991, Reida leased “Crow Flats” land to Frank II for $1075 per month. In 1992 Reida and Frank Sr.’s son, Daniel Stewart, passed away without leaving any children.

Between 1993 and 1994 Frank II borrowed a total of 150,000.00 from Reida and Frank Sr. with no evidence of ever paying off the notes.

In 1994, Frank Sr. and Reida’s assets totaled $1,828,688.

In 1994 Frank II unilaterally suspended payments to Reida for the Crow Flats lease.
As early as 1994, and very likely prior to that time, Frank II was heavily involved in handling finances for Frank Sr’s and Reida’s various investments. At the time, Frank Sr. was approximately 88 years old and Reida was 72.
Frank Sr. passed away on July 24, 2001. At the time of Frank Sr’s death, the following properties/notes were owned by Frank Sr. and/or Reida:

Gillum Ranch$270,000.00
Hudson Ranch$180,000.00
Runyan Ranch$300,000.00
Cornudas Ranch$300,000.00
300 Frontera$ 30,000.00
301 Frontera$180,000.00
Lots 17-20 Cotton Addition$ 80,000.00
20 acres in British Columbia$200,000.00
100 acres in Strauss NM (Dona Ana County)$5,000.00
Loan by Reida to Frank II$ 30,000.00
Loan by Reida to Frank II$ 10,000.00
ET Transportation Note owed to Reida$128,571.42
Loan by Reida to ET Transportation$ 94,285.71
Demand note owed to Reida by Frank II$ 25,000.00
Note owed to Reida by Frank II$ 125,000.00
ET Transportation Note owed to Reida$102,857.14
Tru-Man, Inc. note owed to Reida$ 43,749.57
Note owed to Reida by Frank II
Note owed to Reida by Frank II
Note owed to Reida by Frank II
$ 336,300.00
$ 4,571.43
$ 10,414.29
Note owed to Reida by Frank II$7,342.86
Note owed to Reida by Frank II
Note owed to Reida by Frank II
Demand Note owed to Reida by Frank II
Demand Note owed to Frank Sr. by Frank II
Demand Note owed to Frank Sr. by Frank II
Demand Note owed to Reida by Frank IT
Note owed to Stewart Ranches by Sonitrol
Demand Note owed to Reida by Frank II
Stewart Properties Stock
Note owed to Reida by Frank II
Note owed to Reida by Frank II
1912 Hupmobile
40% Interest in S-S Ranches in Canada
$ 111,142.86
$ 212,042.86
$12,000.00
$100,000.00
$10,725.00
$50,000.00
$60,000.00
$15,000.00
$200,000.00
$347,142.86
$148,571.43
$ 20,000.00
$ 80,000.00

In 2002, Frank II unilaterally reduced the interest payments on a loan or loans owed to Reida from $4505 per month to $1650 per month in conjunction with a memo loan instructing his wife and sons of the reduction but, provided that when Reida needs more money, they were to give her immediate access to all she needs or wants.

The Notes listed above which are held by Reida were obtained by fraud by Frank II without the intent to ever pay the money back to Reida, all to Reida’s detriment. Reida has suffered large losses as a result of the defaults by Frank 11 and the Estate of Frank II.


On January 10, 2022, Reida filed an authenticated claim in the Estate of Frank II. A true and correct copy of the Authenticated Claim is attached hereto as Exhibit A.


This lawsuit is filed not later than the 90th day after the date of rejection of Plaintiffs Authenticated Claim, said rejection occurring by operation of law on February 9, 2022, in compliance with Texas Estates Code.

IV.
Description of Real Property


1. In 1994, Reida and Frank Sr. purchased the property known as:
26T:22R: 17N 1/2 SE 14/ , N 1/2 N1/2 SW 14/ S: 27T: 22R: 17E1/2 NE 14/ , NE 14/ SE 14/ S: 35T: 22R: 17 N1/2 N1/2 SE % NE1/4 known as 980 Pinon Creek Rd., Pinon NM 88344


S: 12T: 22R: 17 S1/2
S: 36T: 21R: 17E1/2
21: 22 R: 17 All S: 35T: 21R: 17Al1 S: 36T: 21R: 17 W1/2 known as 552 Pinon Creek Rd., Pinon, NM 88344


S: 31T: 21 R: 18 All. S: 32 T: 21 R: 18 All known as 167 Dean Ranch Rd., Pinon NM 88344
In 2003, the Property was transferred to Frank II. At the time of the transfer, the market value of the Property was in excess of approximately $270,000.00
2. In September 1983, Reida purchased the property known as East ‘A Section 36, Township 21 South, Range 17 East; All of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, East 12/ West V2, East 12/ Section 31, Township 21 South, Range 18 East; All of Section 32, Township 21 South, Range 18 East.
In 2003, the Property was transferred to Frank II. At the time of the transfer, the market
value of the Property was in excess of approximately $180,000.00
3. On April 27, 1995, Reida and Frank Sr. purchased the following:
Township 22 South, Range 17 East, N.M.P.M. N/2N/2; SW/4 of Section 26, E/2NE/4;
NE/4SE/4 of Section 27 and N/2N/2; SE/4NE/4 of Section 35
Township 22 South, Range 17 East N.M.P.M. S/2 of Section 12, All of Section 2
Township 21 South, Range 18 East, N.M.P.M. all of Sections 32 and 31
Township 21 South, Range 17 East, N.M.P.M. all of Sections 35 and 36
The Property was paid off on September 7, 1995 and the mortgage was released.
In 2003 the Property was transferred to Frank II. Al the time of the transfer, the market value of the Property was in excess of approximately $300,000.00
4. Reida and Frank Sr. purchased the property known as 1 UPPER VALLEY, Tr 17-A (0.32 Acre) also known as 300 Frontera Rd., El Paso, TX
In 2016, the Property was transferred to Frank II. At the time of the transfer, the market value of the Property was in excess of approximately $30,000.00
5. Reida and Frank Sr. purchased the property known as Tract 5A, containing 2 acres, more or less, Block 2, UPPER VALLEY SURVEYS, in the City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas also known as 301 Frontera Rd., El Paso, TX and hereinafter referred to as the “Homestead”. This Homestead property was purchased by Frank Sr. in 1934 before he married Reida. However, this Homestead was where Reida and Frank Sr. resided as their primary residence for most of the remainder of their lives. Reida still resides in the Homestead property.
In Frank Sr’s Last Will and Testament and the codicil, Frank Sr. gave all of his interest in the Homestead outright to Reida in fee simple. The remainder of Frank Sr.’s property was to go into a Residuary Trust.
The Executor of Frank Sr.’s estate was Frank II. Frank II never complied with the Will by deeding the Homestead to Reida and the residuary estate to the Residuary Trust.
In March 2016, Frank II deeded the Homestead to himself. That same year, in July 2016, a life estate was granted to Reida. At the time of the transfer in March 2016, the market value of the Property was in excess of approximately $180,000.00.
6. Frank Sr. purchased the following property on April 20, 1940:
Lots 17, 18, 19 and 20 Block 4. COTTON ADDITION, an addition to the City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas.
On March 1, 2016, the Property was transferred to Frank II. At the time of the transfer, the market value of the Property was $80,000.00
7. Frank Sr. purchased the Property described as Sections 26 and 28 and that portion of Sections 30, 32, 34, and 36 North of U.S. Highway 62 and U.S. Highway 180, all in Block 72, Township 2, Texas and Pacific Railway Company Surveys, Hudspeth County, Texas containing 3,151 acres more or less, hereinafter known as the Williams/Cornudas Ranch.
On March 1, 2016, the Property was transferred to Frank II. At the time of the transfer, the market value of the property was in excess of $300,000.00.
8. 20 acres in British Columbia
9. Reida and Frank Sr. owned property in Dona Ana County. Frank Sr. sold all but 100 acres which was located in Strauss, NM. The market value of the 100 acre Property in Strauss, NM was in excess of $5,000.00. The Property was conveyed by Frank II and the funds are missing.
None of the conveyances referenced above were the subject of any gift tax filings.


V.
Transfer of Property


Most of the above real properties were transferred to Frank II by executing Special Warranty Deeds granting title in fee simple to Frank II.


VI.
Fraudulent Nature of Transfer


Frank II transferred the Property described above with the intent to defraud Frank Sr. and Reida and their legal heirs in that Frank II transferred the Property with the intent of preventing Reida from passing her Property according to her Will. Specifically, the Plaintiff alleges that by controlling all of the funds, both before and after Frank Sr.’s death, Frank II was able to exert undue influence over Reida, without explaining to her the ramification of her signature on the various documents Frank II got Reida to sign. As a result of the fraudulent transfer, the Plaintiff has suffered actual damages in the amount of the value of the Property, plus incidental and consequential damages and has been deprived of adequate funds to support her care.


VII.
COMMON LAW FRAUD, FRAUD BY NON DISCLOSURE AND STATUTORY FRAUD


Frank II made many material representations to Reida which were false, when Frank II made those representations, he knew them to be false and he made the representations with the intent that Reida rely upon them and follow his instruction to sign the various Deeds he presented to her with the instructions to sign them. Frank II’s conduct caused damages and injuries to Reida. The transaction involved real estate.

VIII.
DEED INVALID FOR FAILURE OF CONSIDERATION


Frank II transferred all of the Properties described in Paragraph 4 for less than a reasonably equivalent value, thereby impairing Reida’s financial stability. Specifically, as a direct result of Frank II’s malicious conduct, Frank Sr.’s and Reida’s assets plummeted substantially from $1,828,688 in 1994 when Frank II took over management of his parent’s finances to $310,000.00 in 2022.


IX.
VIOLATION OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE CIVIL PRACTICES AND REMEDIES CODE


Frank II made, presented or used and recorded the Deeds to the Properties listed in Paragraph 4 in the records of the El Paso County Clerk and Hudspeth County Clerk with the knowledge that the Deeds constituted fraudulent claims against the Real Property with the intent that the document have the same legal effect of valid Deeds against the Properties with the intent to cause his mother, Reida to suffer financial injury, all in an effort to procure ownership of Reida’s assets knowing the documents he recorded were fraudulent, with the intent to defraud, in order to become the owner, in fee simple, of valuable real estate. Frank II further used documents or other records of Promissory Notes with the knowledge that Frank II never intended to pay the principal or interest due on the Notes.
Defendant is liable to Plaintiff for the greater of:
A. $10,000.00 or
B. the actual damages caused by the violation in excess of $4,000,000.00

Defendant is also liable for court costs, attorney’s fees and exemplary damages in an amount to be determined by the Court.

X.
Petition for Declaratory Judgment


On August 16, 1993 Frank Sr. executed his Will. The Will instructed the Executor to transfer title to the Homestead to Reida and all other Estate’s Properties to the Residuary Trust. When Frank Sr. died on July 24, 2001, the Court Appointed Executor, Frank II, failed to transfer title to the Homestead to Reida and further failed to note Reida’s interest in the Homestead. Frank II also failed to establish the Residuary Trust and/or transfer the remaining real property to the Residuary Trust.
On March 1, 2016, a Special Warranty Deed for the Homestead was recorded in the El Paso County Deed Records. The Special Warranty Deed named Reida as the Grantor and Frank II as the Grantee. The Special Warranty Deed was executed by the Grantor, Reida, in her capacity as Trustee of the Residuary Trust created under the Will.
On July 19, 2016, a Life Estate Deed was recorded in the El Paso County Deed Records. The Life Estate Deed listed Frank II as the grantor and Reida as Grantee. This Life Estate Deed granted to Reida a life estate in the Homestead.

The Special Warranty Deed identifies Reida in her individual capacity as Grantor stating that Reida is conveying all of her interest in the 301 Frontera Property to Frank II. However, Reida did not execute the Special Warranty Deed in her individual capacity. Instead, she was instructed by Frank II to execute the Special Warranty Deed as Trustee of the Residuary Trust. The Residuary Trust never got title, or any interest, in the 301 Frontera Property so the Residuary Trust could not convey title it did not have. Reida, in her individual capacity, never transferred title to the Homestead.
Reida requests that the Court declare that the Last Will and Testament and the Codicil required Frank II to convey the Homestead directly to Reida in fee simple and further Declare that the remainder of the Properties listed in Paragraph 4 (other than the Homestead) were to be conveyed by Frank II in his capacity as Executor of the Estate of Frank Sr., to the Residuary
Trust. Reida further requests that the Court Declare that Reida, in her individual capacity, never conveyed any interest in the Homestead Property to Frank II and title remains in the name of Reida Stewart.
The plaintiff has retained the firm of Forbes & Forbes to represent the Plaintiff in this action and has agreed to pay the firm reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees. An award of reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees to the plaintiff would be equitable and just and therefore authorized by Section 37.009 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

XI
Trespass to Try Title

Plaintiff would replead paragraph X above as if set forth herein.
This action is one for Trespass to Try Title under Chapter 22 of the Texas Property Code, and Rules 783 et seq., of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and concerns title to the real estate more fully described Tract 5A, containing 2 acres, more or less, Block 2, UPPER VALLEY SURVEYS, in the City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas (the “Homestead”) and filed under clerk’s file number 20160018909, more commonly known as 301 Frontera, El Paso, Texas. Plaintiff is in possession of the 301 Frontera Property, and was, at all times herein, entitled to possession of the 301 Frontera Property.
On March 1, 2016, at a time when Reida did not have the benefit of legal counsel, Frank II unlawfully had Reida execute a Special Warranty Deed with the intent to have the effect of dispossessing Reida of the entirety of the premises. Reida was and still is entitled to ownership of the entire fee simple interest in the Property and Defendant’s estate continues to withhold ownership.
Reida is entitled to recover the fair rental value of the Homestead from and after March 1, 2016, the date on which Defendant stripped Reida of ownership of the Homestead. Reida is entitled to the fair rental value for so long as the Estate of Frank D. Stewart II hold a remainder interest in the Homestead.
Plaintiff has requested that Defendant deed the remainder interest back to Plaintiff, which Defendant has refused to do. Accordingly, under Section 16.034 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Defendant is liable to Plaintiff for reasonable attorney’s fees in an amount determined by the court, in addition to Plaintiff’s claim, plus costs of suit.

XII.
Attorney’s Fees


Plaintiff has retained the firm of FORBES & FORBES to represent Plaintiff in this action and has agreed to pay the firm reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees. An award of reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees to Plaintiff would be equitable and just and is authorized by CPRC
Chapter 12.

XIII
Breach of fiduciary Relationship


The Plaintiff was entitled to rely on the promises and representations of the Defendant, Frank H, on the mutual understanding of the parties and on Frank II’s failure to disclose contrary intent, because there was a fiduciary relationship between Plaintiff and Defendant. The Defendant refused to account for the missing funds and failure to pay the Notes and for the fraudulent transfers of the real properties. Defendant has breached his fiduciary duty to Plaintiff.


XIV
Constructive Trust


It is unconscionable and a breach of the confidential and fiduciary relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant for the defendant to retain the property in dispute as described in Exhibit A. A constructive trust on the property in question is the only remedy that will adequately compensate the plaintiff and prevent the unjust enrichment of the defendant at the plaintiff’s expense.


XV.
EXEMPLARY DAMAGES


Plaintiff would replead paragraphs I through XII above and incorporate same as if fully set forth herein. The wrong done by Frank II was aggravated by the kind of fraudulent conduct and intent for which the law allows the imposition of exemplary damages. Therefore, Plaintiff seeks
exemplary damages in an amount within the jurisdictional limits of the Court.

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests that defendant be cited to appear and answer, and that on final hearing, the plaintiff have judgment as follows:
1. Against the Defendant for a sum within the jurisdictional limits of the court, prejudgment interest as provided by law.
2. A declaration that the Special Warranty Deed filed under Document # 20160018909 in the Real Property Records of El Paso County, Texas is void and unenforceable and does not transfer title to the Real Property at 301 Frontera, El Paso, Texas.
3. A declaration that the Property at 301 Frontera, El Paso, Texas (the “Homestead”)is titled in the name of Reida Stewart.
4. A declaration that the Notes listed in Paragraph Ill above are due and owing by Defendant to Reida and are accruing interest at the lawful rate.
5. A decree setting aside and canceling the transfer of all parcels of real property and stock listed in Paragraph 4 above evidencing the transfer as fraudulent.
5. Post judgment interest as provided by law from the date of judgment until paid.
6. Costs of suit and reasonable attorney’s fees as are equitable and just.
7. Other and further relief to which the plaintiff may be entitled.


Respectfully submitted,
SUSAN . FORBES
Attorney for Applicant
State Bar No.: 00790704
711 Myrtle
El Paso, TX 79901
Telephone: (915) 533-5441
Facsimile: (915) 533-7441
E-mail: smforbes@forbeslawoffiee.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on the /3 day of April, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was caused to be delivered to Rob Edwards, 4695 North Mes St,1131 Paso, Texas 79912.

Paso County – Probate Court 2
IN THE ESTATE OF
FRANK STEWART JR.,
DECEASED
Hied 1/10/2U22 11:28 AM
Della Briones
County Clerk
El Paso Count
2020-CPRO162

No. 2020-CPR01624
IN THE PROBATE COURT NO. 2


EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS
AUTHENTICATED UNSECURED CLAIM
No. XXXXXX
IN THE ESTATE OF
FRANK STEWART II.,
DECEASED
§ IN THE PROBATE COURT
§ NO.1
§ EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS
AUTHENTICATED UNSECURED CLAIM


1. REIDA STEWART is the owner of an unsecured claim against the Estate of FRANK STEWART II, Deceased, in a sum in excess of $4,110,253.59.
2. Claimant requests that the claim be allowed and approved.

“The foregoing unsecured claim is just and all legal offsets, payments, and credits known to Claimant have been allowed.